data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e8b2/3e8b2737e78476f4c2661b1ff0b934bb686ea594" alt="Clinical Risk Banner Image"
Quantum Update for Clinical Negligence Practitioners
Apr 29 2025
Bevan Brittan Education Lunchtime Training Webinars 2025
Read MoreThis update contains brief details of recent Government publications, legislation, cases and other developments relevant to those involved in local government work, which have been published in thetwo weeks up to 29 May 2015. Items are set out by subject, with a link to where the full document can be found on the internet.
This update contains brief details of recent Government publications, legislation, cases and other developments relevant to those involved in local government work, which have been published in the previous two weeks. Items are set out by subject, with a link to where the full document can be found on the internet.
If you have been forwarded this update by a colleague and would like to receive it direct please email Claire Booth.
All links are correct at the date of publication. The following topics are covered in this update:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Welsh Government: Protecting community assets: seeks views on a proposed new Welsh law to help communities bid for, own and run assets transferred from the public and private sectors, such as halls, churches, playing fields, pubs and post offices. Other options include strengthening existing guidance on community assets, or mirroring the current situation in England through enacting the Assets of Community Value Measures in the Localism Act 2011. The consultation closes on 11 September 2015. (21 May 2015)
If you wish to discuss any of the items noted in this section please contact Olwen Dutton.
R (Morris) v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBC [2015] EWHC 1403
(Admin) (Admin Ct): M sought judicial review of the local
authority's decision to cease funding full-time nursery education
for three year olds from September 2015. They argued that the
information provided by the authority in the consultation was
insufficiently fair and accurate. They submitted that R
(Moseley) v Haringey LBC [2014] UKSC 56 established a general
proposition that it was necessary to invite views on possible
alternatives to the proposal so as to enable an intelligent
response.
The court held, refusing the application, that while
Moseley stated the general principles on
consultation, it did not establish any inviolable rule that
alternatives had to be consulted upon in every consultation
exercise. Sometimes fairness might require it to be the case so
that consultees could make sense of the consultation exercise. When
that was the case, the alternatives would have to be realistic
alternatives, which would always depend upon the particular
circumstances of the consultation to be carried out. The
authority had also discharged its duty to secure sufficient
childcare so far as it was reasonably practicable to do so. (18 May
2015)
If you wish to discuss any of the items noted in this section please contact Virginia Cooper.
Cities and Local Government Devolution Bill: this Bill has been introduced into the House of Lords and received its 1st Reading. The Bill takes forward a number of reforms which are intended to allow for the implementation of devolution agreements with combined authority areas and with other areas. It amends Part 6 of the Local Democracy, Construction and Economic Development Act 2009 to enable the Secretary of State to make regulations that:
See also the Explanatory Notes to the Bill. (29 May 2015)
LGA: English devolution – Local solutions for a successful nation: this paper sets out local government's offer of a new partnership with Government to tackle the big challenges facing the country and secure a bright future for all. It aims to open discussion on the shape and extent of an ambitious new local/central partnership that should be based on clarified and mutually-respected roles and local government’s offer to play its full part in creating a devolved solution that will realise the new administration’s national vision. (21 May 2015)
If you wish to discuss any of the items noted in this section please contact David Hutton.
R (Diocese of Menevia) v City and County of Swansea
Council [2015] EWHC 1436 (Admin) (Admin Ct): the claimants were
pupils at a Roman Catholic school in Swansea that was supported by
the Diocese. The Council was the local education authority for the
area. The claimants applied for judicial review of the Council's
decision to amend its school transport policy so
that pupils attending faith schools would be entitled to
free public transport only if the relevant distance criteria were
met and no suitable alternative school (including non-faith
schools) was located within two/three miles of home. This
amended policy did not apply to those pupils who attended Welsh
medium schools, so pupils whose home was more than three miles
from a Welsh medium comprehensive school would continue to be
eligible for free transport to and from that school even though
there was an English school within three miles of home. The
claimants argued that the amended policy constituted indirect race
discrimination under s.19 of the Equality Act 2010 and
under Art.14 and Protocol 1 Art.2 of the ECHR. They
also claimed that the report to Council contained an error of
law which vitiated the Council's decision.
The court held, granting the application and quashing the decision,
that BME children would be at a particular disadvantage as compared
with White British children as a consequence of the amended policy.
The twin objectives of costs saving and promoting access to
education through the medium of Welsh was sufficiently important to
justify limiting a fundamental right, and the amended
policy was rationally connected to the objective. On the
evidence, the court was not satisfied that the means chosen by the
Council were no more than was necessary to accomplish the
objective, nor was it satisfied that the amended policy was a
proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. The Council did
not have to establish that there was no other way of achieving its
objectives but it had to demonstrate that its amended policy was
reasonably necessary; that was not possible in the absence of a
clear appraisal of alternatives. The challenge under the ECHR
failed - the provisions of the ECHR were not engaged and the
obligation under Protocol 1 Art.2 did not extend to subsiding
and/or paying the whole cost for transportation between home and
school.
The Education Department officer's report to the Council contained
a clear error of law that vitiated the decision. The error of
law was not immaterial. The fact that members were advised
that they had no option but to continue with the provision of free
transport to Welsh medium schools provided the distance criteria
were met was likely to be a consideration of some significance in
their deliberations; had the true legal position been explained to
members their decision might well have been different. (22 May
2015)
If you wish to discuss any of the items noted in this section please contact Olwen Dutton.
DCLG: Localising Council Tax support new burdens grant determination (2015 to 2016): confirms the amount of 2015/16 new burdens grant payments to local authorities in England. (19 May 2015)
If you wish to discuss any of the items noted in this section please contact Olwen Dutton.
DCLG: Greg Clark tells Whitehall and town halls: loosen your grip on surplus land: the Communities Secretary Greg Clark is to urge departments to “loosen their grip” on sites that are standing idle so they can be released for new housebuilding, with a clear target to release enough land for 150,000 homes by 2020. At the forthcoming meeting of the new dedicated ministerial Housing Taskforce, he will call on England’s councils to follow the Government’s lead and look at the land assets they hold, and use some of those plots, particularly those on brownfield sites, to provide new homes for their communities. The Housing Bill (see below) will require local authorities to establish and maintain a register of brownfield land suitable for housing development, which will include their own land. (31 May 2015)
DCLG: Right to Buy – Summary booklet: this updated booklet is for tenants interested in taking up their Right to Buy. It provides an overview of eligibility criteria, discount levels, the application process, how to take the next steps and useful contacts for free, unbiased advice, including the Right to Buy Agent service. It takes into account the major changes made to Right to Buy in April 2012 and July 2014, and the changes to eligibility in May 2015. (26 May 2015)
Welsh Government: £108 million investment in social housing: announces funding for local authorities and Registered Social Landlords to improve people’s homes and ensure they are safe, secure and meet the Welsh Housing Quality Standard (WHQS).(19 May 2015)
Haile v Waltham Forest LBC (Rev 1) [2015] UKSC 34
(Sup Ct): the Supreme Court has reviewed the House of Lords'
decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC [1983] 1 AC 657 regarding the date
for determining whether a person was intentionally homeless under
Part VII of the Housing Act 1996. The Lords had ruled that
it is the date on which the person left the accommodation, not
the date on which they applied to the local authority for
assistance. In this case, the Council decided
that H had become homeless intentionally because she
voluntarily gave up the hostel accommodation that was (at the time)
reasonable for her to continue to occupy. The Council decided that
her subsequent pregnancy was irrelevant to the question of her
intentional homelessness. The Court of Appeal upheld this
decision.
The Supreme Court held, allowing the appeal, that the correct
legal test was “whether, in light of the intervening event, it
cannot reasonably be said that, but for the applicant’s deliberate
conduct, he or she would not have become homeless”. Applying this
test, H, by the time of her application, would have been
unable to continue to occupy the hostel (through no fault of her
own), her deliberate act that caused the actual loss of that
accommodation could no longer taint her current homelessness, which
would have occurred in any event. (20 May 2015)
Hotak v Southwark LBC (Rev 1) [2015] UKSC 30 (Sup Ct): these three joined appeals raised a number of issues concerning the duty of local housing authorities towards homeless people who claimed to be "vulnerable", and therefore to have "a priority need" for the provision of housing accommodation under Part VII of the Housing Act 1996. The Supreme Court held, reviewing the case law, that "vulnerability" was a comparative concept. The correct comparator was an ordinary person made homeless, not an ordinary homeless person, still less an ordinary street homeless person, and still even less an ordinary street homeless person within the local authority's district. (13 May 2015)
For commentary on both these cases, see our Alerts: Making a Din: Re-visiting intentional homelessness and Supreme Court re-defines "vulnerability" in homelessness cases
If you wish to discuss any of the items noted in this section please contact David Isaacson.
Queen's Speech 2015: the Queen has outlined the Government’s legislative programme for the next year, on the State Opening of Parliament. Bills of particular interest to local government include:
Her Majesty also announced:
For further details, see the Government's Background briefing notes and the LGA's On the day briefing. ((27 May 2015)
If you wish to discuss any of the items noted in this section please contact Olwen Dutton.
Institute of Economic Affairs: Drinking, fast and slow – Ten years of the Licensing Act: this research report finds that far from provoking a 24-hour drinking culture, the Licensing Act 2003 has removed some of the constraints on where and when people can have a drink, providing the public with greater choice. The relaxation of licensing laws ten years ago benefited consumers and did not result in the disastrous outcomes predicted at the time. Violent crime fell, alcohol consumption fell and rates of binge-drinking fell, particularly amongst young people. (20 May 2015)
If you wish to discuss any of the items noted in this section please contact Adam Kendall.
PHE: Heatwave Plan for England: this latest Heatwave Plan aims to prepare for, alert people to, and prevent, the major avoidable effects on health during periods of severe heat in England. It recommends a series of steps to reduce the risks to health from prolonged exposure to severe heat for: the NHS, local authorities, social care, and other public agencies; professionals working with people at risk; and individuals, local communities and voluntary groups. (22 May 2015)
If you wish to discuss any of the items noted in this section please contact Olwen Dutton.
BRDO: Business Secretary sets out plans for Primary Authority: the new Business Secretary Sajid Javid has announced plans to simplify and extend Primary Authority, which allows a business to get advice on regulation from a single local council or fire service. This advice must then be followed by all other local authorities. (20 May 2015)
Surveillance Camera Commissioner: Letter from the Surveillance Camera Commissioner to local authority chief executives: Tony Porter, the Surveillance Camera Commissioner, has written to all local authority chief executives to remind them of their duty under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to pay due regard to the Surveillance Camera Code of Practice. He asks local authorities to complete the self-assessment tool, to identify quickly where they are meeting the 12 guiding principles in the Code and where they may need to take action to comply. Local authorities should inform him by 30 June 2015 that this has been done. (21 May 2015)
If you wish to discuss any of the items noted in this section please contact Adam Kendall.
LGO: Investigation into a complaint against County Durham Council: the LGO has recommended that the Council review its process for investigating complaints of serious misconduct against its officers to ensure in future it responds properly, after the buyer of a property complained that a building control officer at the Council had improperly used knowledge gained through his employment for his personal advantage and to the complainant's detriment. The LGO found that the officer had breached the Council's Code of Conduct for Employees by making professional decisions about the plot after he had acquired a personal and financial interest in it, and by failing to declare a possible conflict of interest after making an offer on the plot after visiting it in his official capacity. The Council then failed to properly investigate the complaint of misconduct by an officer, and failed to identify the breaches. The LGO also recommended that the Council pay £250 compensation. (12 May 2015)
If you wish to discuss any of the items noted in this section please contact Olwen Dutton.
We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set optional analytics cookies to help us improve it. We won't set optional cookies unless you enable them. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences. For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page.
Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We'd like to set Google Analytics cookies to help us to improve our website by collection and reporting information on how you use it. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone.
For more information on how these cookies work, please see our Cookies page.